Nigeria is
less than a month away from its presidential election that is shaping up to be
a classic contest between President Goodluck Jonathan of the People’s
Democratic Party (PDP) and General
Muhammadu Buhari (Rtd.) of the main opposition party, the All
Progressives Congress (APC). Elections are also going to be held for governors
and legislators at federal and state level in February.
The campaign
has reached fever-pitch with the candidates and their supporters throwing their
best shots at their opponents in the process of attempting to convince the
electorate that they are the best candidate for the office they are running
for.
One key
factor that has characterised this campaign is the use of negative tactics by
the two major parties that can at best be described as attempts at destroying the
image of the opponent. However, this is only leading to deep division along
ethnic and religious lines which are well-known fault lines in Nigeria. The suggestion
that because of a certain candidate’s religion, he should not be voted for or
that a candidate should get our votes because he is from a certain part of the
country only help to entrench division and hatred that can lead to conflict and
violence.
A bad
example of an attempt at destroying an opponent’s image was the front page
advert in the Punch newspaper on Monday, January 19, 2015. In the advert
sponsored by Governor Ayo Fayose of Ekiti state, a PDP member and supporter of
President Goodluck Jonathan, it was suggested that General Muhammadu Buhari
might die in office if elected as President, like former Heads of State, General
Muritala Mohammed, General Sani Abacha, and President Umar Musa Yar’adua. This
has caused outrage in the public with many people including some PDP supporters
condemning the advert.
However,
until we the voters begin to teach politicians that we seek proper governance
by asking them to tell us in clear unambiguous detail how they intend to
address issues like insecurity, unemployment, poor infrastructure and economic
downtown that affect us, we will continue to be ruled by such crude people who
don’t care about our needs.
What can we
expect from Governor Fayose and his ilk when he got elected into office in
Ekiti state on the back of a campaign based on “stomach infrastructure”? The
premise that Nigerians will vote for you as long as you can give them “something
to eat” immediately rather than empower them to feed themselves and others for
life was shockingly successful in Ekiti state last year. Should we blame him if
he takes encouragement from his success in Ekiti state and then tries to
support his preferred presidential candidate with odious effrontery at the
national level?
I submit that
we should not blame Governor Fayose and his ilk at all, rather, we as a people
should blame ourselves for not teaching politicians in the past that such political
rascality as he exhibited during his first tenure as governor would not be
tolerated by us and punished at the polls with our votes against them.
We must as a
matter of urgency begin to ask all the major candidates at all levels the
pertinent questions and not allow ourselves be victims of our collective
poor decision-making as voters once again. The chance
to right some of the wrongs of the past beckons on us in February 2015, the big
question for us is: shall we get it right this time?
No comments:
Post a Comment