Maryland woman awarded $800K after landlord rented infested
unit, refused to treat
Faika Shabaan, an Annapolis, Maryland woman who lived with
bed bugs in a rental unit for more than eight months, has been awarded $800,000
in compensatory damages for loss and suffering.
According to NBC News, the lawsuit argued that the landlord
in this case knew about bed bugs in the unit when the lease was signed, but did
not disclose the problem (the subject of an open housing code violation) to the
tenant.
The Capital Gazette notes that Shabaan first suffered from
what she later discovered to be bed bug bites from when she moved in in October
through April, when someone finally suggested the skin lesions might be from
bed bugs.
That led Shabaan to ask around in the building, according to
The Capital Gazette:
Shaaban worried
about her neighbors — a woman and baby who lived in the second apartment in the
converted home.
The woman told
Shaaban she’d reported the bedbug problem to Barrett for weeks and nothing had
been done.
Shaaban next spoke
to the superintendent on the site. The man, who also lived in the home, said he
knew about the infestation, but was afraid he’d lose his job if he told the
tenants. He said he got bitten every night, too.
Shaaban contacted
city employees to complain. Records show Barrett was found in violation and
ordered to hire a licensed, professional pest control contractor to eradicate
pest in units A and B.
“He defies the
order of the city,” Whitney said. “He decides to pick up some propane heaters
and do it (himself), not knowing what he’s doing.”
Heat treatment is not a do it yourself project.
But the horror does not end there!
According to The Capital Gazette, in apparent retaliation
for her reports to the city, the landlord then shut off Shabaan’s hot water and
eventually her entire water supply, and finally evicted her while she was out —
so that the tenant arrived home to find the remnants of her belongings on the
curb– that is, the stuff which hasn’t already been stolen.
It’s noteworthy that the amount awarded was twice what the
plaintiff asked for. And to put it in
perspective, as The Baltimore Sun notes, it’s more than twice the $382,000 that
the brother and sister plaintiffs received in the Mathias v. Accor judgment in
2002. (In that famous case, a Chicago
Motel 6 rented a unit it knew to be infested.)
As Shabaan’s lawyer Daniel Whitney told the Capital Gazette,
“The jury was asked to send a message… I think they have.”
Articles about landlords being held responsible for bed bug
treatment usually elicit a certain resistance among the commenters, so let me
be clear: we are not anti-landlord.
Landlords and tenants should both have rights in a bed bug situation.
However, there is no way on earth that a landlord should be
allowed to rent a unit which is known to have a bed bug problem which hasn’t
been eliminated. Landlords should not
get away with not disclosing such a situation to a prospective tenant.
And if the law requires landlords to address bed bugs, they
should not be allowed to ignore this. We
hear about these two situations more often than you’d think, and it really is
despicable.
Source: Bedbugger
No comments:
Post a Comment